9-11
PLEASE, support The
Lawyers Committee for 9/11
Background (from their website)
In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, Congress initiated
the “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities
Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001?,
also known as the “Congressional Joint Inquiry on 9/11”.
It was comprised of the House and Senate Intelligence
Committees. This was followed in January 2003 by the U.S.
Government’s public investigation known as the 9/11
Commission. Their task was to fully investigate and explain
what had occurred on 09/11/2001.
Beginning almost immediately and persisting to the present,
serious questions have been raised about both the
Congressional Joint Inquiry and the 9/11 Commission’s
version of events surrounding 9/11. There has been extensive
media coverage of anomalies in the official account,
destruction of evidence, obstruction, and even perjury. Many
observers, including notably the families of the victims,
criticized both inquiries for failing to address hundreds of
key questions. An objective analysis, even quoting admissions
by members of the investigations, leads to evidence of cover
ups.
Given that the events of 9/11/01 has been used to shape
U.S. foreign and military policy and ushered in an era of
all-encompassing surveillance of all Americans, much more
scrutiny and fact-finding is warranted.
Many chapters listing anomalies and problems cited by
government officials which illustrate the shortcomings of the
official 9/11 Commission’s investigation. Here are just a
few facts to consider:
- Evidence at the scene of the World Trade Center and
Pentagon was destroyed or confiscated and withheld from
public scrutiny.
- Evidence given by the CIA to the 9/11 Commission was
obtained through torture and is inadmissible. Tapes held
by the FAA were destroyed.
- Eyewitness reports from firefighters, police officers,
and other reliable witnesses present in and near the WTC
buildings on 9/11 have never been submitted as evidence in
a legal action.
- News reports, most notably from local New York City
television stations, containing coverage of loud
explosions were never presented as part of any official
investigation.
- A FOIA case has revealed that NIST had made false
statements claiming there were no samples of steel from
WTC 7 for analysis when a photo that was obtained proves
there is a sample.
- There continues to be thousands of pages of classified
documents. A forensic analysis of physical evidence at the
crime scenes has yet to occur.
In a properly functioning judicial system, federal and
state attorney generals or special prosecutors would have
taken actions to establish all the facts and obtain the
fullest measure of justice. The reality has fallen far short
of this.
Understanding the Scope of Obstruction
visit the
website for more
 Highly credible people question
events of 9/11
Rule19 has made available a booklet
that might be useful to have or even hand out as you collect
signatures.
Evidence-Based
Facts
|
